The Met Gala 2022 will have been talked about! While our Frenchwoman, Léna Situations walked the red carpet for the first time, Kim Kardashian played the big game. Indeed, the pretty brunette wore an iconic dress by Marylin Monroe. So far, no worries. On the other side, we have the beautiful Lili Reinhart, known for advocating self-acceptance. The young woman refuses all injunctions on the female body. So when Kim Kardashian proudly announces having lost more than 7kg in front of the cameras, it’s too much. She publishes for the first time in Story Instagram: “ I’m not usually an angry person “. ” But I swear to God, the toxicity of this industry sometimes really gets to me, that I have to rant on Instagram to unleash my rage.” ».
Lili Reinhart: “Stupid and Harmful”
Lili comes back later to explain her stroke. The pretty actress Explain : ” Walk down the red carpet and do an interview where you talk about how ‘hungry’ you are…because you haven’t eaten carbs in the last month, all to fit into a fuckin’ dress? It’s so wrong. So bad on a hundred levels. To openly admit that you’re starving yourself for the Met Gala. When you know very well that millions of young people, men and women, take you as an example and drink in your every word. Ignorance comes from another world and disgusts. Please stop supporting those stupid, hurtful celebrities whose entire image revolves around their bodies. ». Hailed by many, Kim Kardashian sends him an answer.
Don-A-Matrix, Kim’s sports coach, wanted to make things clear: ” I think one of the misconceptions is that she works really hard. I was there throughout the process and it wasn’t like some kind of starvation, she wasn’t starving. She ate a really balanced diet and sometimes she didn’t eat as much, but then she went to the gym and worked hard. “. Not sure that changes the situation. The famous Kardashian publishes, meanwhile, an untargeted message, but which leaves no room for doubt: “ Be supportive of learning. Be open-minded. you are not always right. “. Blood stroke exaggerated or relevant?